on 7/5/04 10:59 AM, Jon Kerr wrote:

> Interesting. Apparently free speech continues to be arbitrary at the Farmers
> Market.

> A few years ago I witnessed the same manager (Jack Gerten) authoritatively
> telling volunteers politely passing out anti-stadium literature that they
> were not allowed on Market grounds. This happened even while there was a
> Twins entourage, including Tony Oliva, holding forth in the middle of the
> Market. This was in the middle of the referendum debate and was clearly a
> "political event" being welcomed by the Market.

> Eventually the Market Manager relented when several of us suggested there
> might be First Amendment issues. Both parties coexisted nicely and didn't
> appear like any shoppers were being hindered from purchasing their zuchinis
> or free range chickens. So at the time I gave Gerten the benefit of the
> doubt and hoped he'd learned a lesson.

> But it does appear that free speech continues to depend on what the Market
> Manager decides is allowable on a particular occasion. One wonders what
> other arbitrariness is involved in the operation of our  Farmers Market? Who
> is on the board and who do they represent? Who actually controls policy on
> what is clearly public space receiving public subsidy and is seeking even
> more to open a new indoor market?

> Jon Kerr
> West Side

Similar inconsistent and hypocritical responses from Jack Gerten, who owns
the corporate Gerten Nurseries, might easily be expected if any of
Minnesota's elected officials were to move in with their entourages and
"accost" Farmers' Market customers.

The mere presence of political activity in  public forum is going to elicit
reaction along and on both ends of the ideological spectrum. Most customers
need merely to say, as Erik Hare observes,  "No, thank you," or "Sure."or
grimace and walk away. Complaining to management is inevitable. Doesn't mean
management has a right to use the few complaints it gets to curtail 1st
Amendment freedoms of all the others present. Customers have as much a right
to say yes to canvassers and surveyors as they do to complain or say no.

And the canvassers and surveyors - trained to a fare-thee-well, as I recall,
to be courteous and as unobtrusive as possible - would hardly be supported
by their parent organization if their behavior would bring it a bad name.

All this to say, it's quite obvious it's the organization and its message or
mission to which Gerten and a few customers object, not the fact of the
survey. What is truly sad about these anecdotes is the increasingly
pervasive notion that freedom of speech only entails my freedom to speak and
not yours if I don't agree with the content of your message.

And where did that notion get its seeds? Right out of this nation's law
enforcement community, aided and abetted by an administration that labels
dissenters "traitors", and which abandons its role as freedoms enforcers,
and believes dissent is an excuse to bash heads, arrest and carry off even
the most peaceful of such dissenters, believing themselves at war with their
fellow countrymen and women.

This is why the Jack Gertens of the world feel free to harass the lowly
campaign worker with whom he disagrees - no matter how public the space may
be or how much the majority of shoppers are generally unaffected by their
presence.

This is as systemic as it is dangerous. Erik is on the money. We must
descend on this private institution which operates at the pleasure of the
city, our city, and with our money as their subsidies.

That, too, seems to get lost in the possessiveness manifest by the Gertens
of the world as well. It's mine, not yours, even when taxpayers foot the
bill.



Andy Driscoll
Crocus Hill/Ward 2
------

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to