I'm not necessarily opposed to tracking or to gifted and talented programs.  I 
graduated 35th in a class of some of the brightest high school kids you could ever 
hope to meet (Saint Paul Central Class of 92 had 10 National Merit Semifinalists) and 
went on to a private college (Saint Olaf) where some private school kids and 
suburban/rural public schools served up peers that struggled with things that we had 
mastered by 10th grade.
 
The strange part for me is that most of my public school choices were to attend the 
neighborhood schools that I would have attended minus a magnet school program (JJ 
Hill, Longfellow, Ramsey, Central).  What was divergent was the number of friends I 
had from other parts of the city.  Students that would have attended high schools like 
Highland, Como, Harding and Johnson.  Why did they choose Central when their peers did 
not ?  
 
The answer was a public school "track" that helped educate parents about options.  To 
be fair, these were the type of parents that might have educated themselves anyway, 
but it was a network of information that brought more information to some parents than 
to others.  
 
I'm not trying to say that it is easy to figure out how to get this information out to 
all parents, I'm just saying that I think that some families have more information 
than others.  If we want to imply that we have a consumer driven model, we need to 
make sure that the consumers have the information to exercise choice.
 
Matt Flory
Mac Groveland

Bob Treumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure if the definition of "Tracking" is important here, and since
I am not an educator, I don't have the official word.

However, my experience as a St Paul parent is that when people say they
are against "Tracking", what they mean is that they don't want to give
smart high-acheiving kids an appropriately challenging curriculum, because
they know that if they do that, the results will not be racially balanced.

So, to preserve the illusion that all kids are getting a challenging and
thought provoking education, we won't allow kids to be separated by
ability and taught at an appropriate level.

Thus, the smart kids are bored in class, and think school is too easy.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Matt describes tracking and asks if this is choice.
> y
> Tracking is a system that encourages some students to take rigourous,
> college
> prep courses, and encourages others to take other, much less challenging
> courses. It is exactly the opposite of what we are working for - we are
> trying to
> help St. Paul high schools develop small more individualized schools in
> which
> ALL students are challenged, all students are prepared for some form of
> post-secondary education when they graduate, and ALL students have thought
> hard -
> and investigated various careers.
>
> The is high expectations for all - not high expectations for some, and
> lower
> for others.
>
> Joe
> _____________________________________________
> To Join: St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
>
> Archive Address:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
>


--
Bob Treumann, Saint Paul
Please Note: Replies to this email address all go to the trash except
where the subject line contains a recognized mailing list identifier, such
as [TCMETRO],[StPaul], MP-N ...


                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to