Chuck -

I did not know you were one of the plaintiff's. Thank
you for all of your efforts.

Dan


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> In a message dated 10/21/2004 3:17:55 PM Eastern
> Daylight Time, "Chris Boylan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >I believe the settlement also prohibited a direct
> east-bound >94 to south bound 35E connection and
> therefore something in >excessive of 25,000 cars
> wander through the W. 7th and >Lexington areas to
> connect. �
> 
> >Someone correct me if I remember the settlement
> terms incorrectly or the car count wrong. �
> >
> 
> Well, on that one you are wrong.  There was never a
> desire on MNDOT or the Fed's to create a direct
> connection between East bound 94 and South bound
> 35E.  There was also no desire on the Fed's or
> MNDOT's part to create a direct connection between
> north bound 35E and west bound 94. So, there is no
> mention of either of them in anyway in the
> settlement.  
> 
> We have done this before, but one more time just for
> the fun of it.  The issues of the suit were the over
> building of freeways and the adverse impact of
> individual land owners when (1) The Federal goals
> were already accomplished (35 was completed through
> MPLS - these things were built to move troops from
> Mexico to Canada - mission accomplished when 35W was
> completed) (2) Less intrusive and less expensive
> options existed (Sheppard Road or the re-designation
> of HWY 52) (3) The state had already concede the
> lack of need by passing legislation requiring no
> direct connection between 35E and 94 (that law was
> later changed).  
> 
> There existed a real chance that we would have won
> in Federal Court and road work would have been
> ordered stopped and Federal dollars would not have
> been available to complete the roadway.  But a
> compromise was reached, 45 MPH and no trucks.  Not a
> bad deal for the state considering if they lost they
> would have lost all of the Federal dollars in the
> project.  
> 
> Any of the Ayde Mill issues, direct connection from
> east bound 94 to south bound 35E or direct
> connection from north bound 35E to west bound 94 are
> just in the minds of the commuters and those who
> live off of Ayde Mill, none of whom were part of the
> law suit.
> 
> Chuck Repke
> Party to the Law Suit
> RIP 35E
> _____________________________________________
> To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your
> password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
> 
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
> 

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to