Well, this is not unlike all of the other public funding of private
corporations St. Paul has forked over the last 25 years. All major deals
have been cut with corporate executives closely tied to the Chamber of
Commerce and the clubby little group of local business people who shuffle
the big bucks between themselves and bleed the city treasury of taxpayers
dollars as though every investment in the city should be subsidized by us.
When it comes to Minnesota Public Radio, little more than just another
corporate empire with a non-profit sheen few dare criticize, contributions
to that enterprise are tax-deductible and to deny them a request for public
dollars is billed like mom and apple-pie stuff.

Most of us have a love-hate relationship with MPR, but for Bill Kling to
come before the St. Paul government asking for a hand-out to purchase WCAL
is the scrabby end.

But since MPR, which has already bilked millions from public and private
coffers on its way to a public broadcasting monopoly, is located in the core
city, it obviously is seen as another business to funnel money to. They've
been allowed to vacate all of 9th Street to expand their kingdom's castle
and, despite their riches, they've been handed hundreds of thousands in
public dollars.

Still, it is the more reliable source for news even as it picks our pockets,
so I listen to the news outlet. But their music programming has narrowed the
breadth of classical offerings to a measurable minimum in deference to the
less-than-adventurous Minnesota ear and, now, with the takeover of WCAL,
complete the blanding of classical radio in the Twin Cities and across
Minnesota. It's a dire day in this state, and someone has to put the brakes
on this global "public" broadcasting group that includes American Public
Radio  and PRI,, not to mention their for-profit companies from which
revenues are sucked into the Kling-on empire.

That's why it's a St. Paul matter. And SaveWCAL hasn't a prayer of
overcoming this economic and political powerhouse.

Andy Driscoll
Crocus Hill/Ward 2
Former public broadcaster
------


Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:26:01 -0600
From: "Pam Ellison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [StPaul] Why is the City of Saint Paul involved in this?
Anyone know?

Everyone:

This just came across my desktop. What is going on?  Why is the City of
Saint Paul taking this up, when it has little to do with Saint Paul.  It
seems to me that we should be much involved in CITY issues that are
pressing.  Beefing up the police force, discussing our funding woes in
education and seeing that the citizens of Saint Paul are taken care of.

Any comments?

Pamela Ellison
Como Park
Saint Paul

Save WCAL - Act NOW!

by repost 
18 Nov 2004 

While there is a 30-day appeal period with the FCC, St. Olaf and MPR have
announced that they will close the sale of WCAL within fewer than 10 days.
Immediate action from SaveWCAL supporters is needed.

Dear friends, 

While there is a 30-day appeal period with the FCC, St. Olaf and MPR have
announced that they will close the sale of WCAL within fewer than 10 days.
Immediate action from SaveWCAL supporters is needed.

Today SaveWCAL is making public the information that a Committee of the St.
Olaf Board of Regents has dismissed our proposal to keep WCAL at St. Olaf, a
proposal that is superior to the MPR bid.

This morning we sent a response to the Regents, refuting their review of our
initial proposal and addressing erroneous assumptions that may have been
made throughout the process of the sale. We again appealed to the Regents to
consider fully the consequences of the sale that could close within days.

One of the most significant consequences is the expected loss of
contributions to St. Olaf College if the sale is finalized.

Senior Regent and major benefactor Leonard Hoeft tells us that he is
convinced St. Olaf will lose more than $10 million in contributions to the
college if the sale goes through. Hoeft is adamantly opposed to the sale and
thinks the process was flawed. He believes that the Regents were not
accurately informed of important issues pertaining to the sale.

Our proposal is fundamentally superior to the MPR proposal and we believe
the Board of Regents should choose it. In order for this to happen, the
Regents need to call a special meeting of the St. Olaf College Board of
Regents to reconsider the sale.

As we implored the Board of Regents, we now implore you to read these
documents and consider what this sale will mean for the future of WCAL radio
and St. Olaf College.

We specifically request the following from SaveWCAL supporters:

1. Review the pertinent documents, particularly SaveWCAL's Response to the
Regents at: PDF: http://www.saveWCAL.org/pdf/RPB03_ResponseToRegents.pdf
WORD: http://www.saveWCAL.org/pdf/RPB03_ResponseToRegents.doc

2. Forward this e-mail TODAY to St. Olaf students, faculty, alumni, parents
and friend you know who care about St. Olaf and WCAL.

3. Forward this e-mail TODAY to all WCAL members and listeners you know.

4. Contact members of the Board of Regents. Public contact information is
found at: http://www.savewcal.org/stolaf.html . St. Olaf alumni will find
further contact information for alumni Regents by searching the St. Olaf
online alumni directory at: http;//www.stolaf.edu/alumni/

SaveWCAL's initial proposal, the response from the Regents' Committee and
SaveWCAL's response documents can now be found on our web site in our Public
Document Library at http://www.savewcal.org/library.html

We have no time to lose. We must not allow the truth to be hidden. ACT NOW!

Thank you for your continuing support and active involvement!

Ruth Sylte '82 SaveWCAL President for the board and volunteers of SaveWCAL

See also: 
http://www.savewcal.org
http://www.savewcal.org/stolaf.html

SaveWCAL delays MPRs financing of WCAL purchase

by Ruth M. Sylte 
Email: SaveWCAL (at) hotmail.com 18 Nov 2004 Modified: 07:08:45 PM

Did the St. Paul City council fund the purchase of independent radio station
WCAL by Minnesota Public Radio? And was their process for doing so legal?
Are they using revenue bonds to improve blighted areas to increase the
blight on the radio dial?

SaveWCAL has discovered that on October 27, 2004, the members of the St.
Paul City Council, in their role as Commissioners of the St. Paul Housing
and Redevelopment Authority (HRA), gave preliminary approval for issuance of
$22 Million in conduit revenue bonds for the MPR Project. MPR has designated
$12 million of the bond proceeds specifically for the purchase of WCAL/KMSE.

Revenue bonds would provide MPR a less expensive way of borrowing money to
purchase WCAL. The interest rate on the bonds is less because the income
payable to the bond holders is not subject to income taxation. State law
authorizes an HRA to issue revenue bonds "for the purpose of preventing the
emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment."
Minn. Stat. 469.152. There is no way that the purchase of a radio station in
the City of Northfield (together with transmitter towers in Dakota County
and Olmsted County) would prevent the emergence of blighted and marginal
lands and areas of chronic unemployment in the City of St. Paul. The use of
revenue bonds for the purchase of WCAL would violate state law.

The lead underwriter for the bonds is Piper Jaffray. Note that of the seven
Piper Jaffray board members, three are members of the MPR Board of Trustees
(Addison Piper, Michael Francis, and Frank Sims) and two are members of the
St. Olaf Board of Regents (Addison Piper and Kristine Johnson '73).

The current HRA preliminary approval is in addition to previous HRA
approvals including one in 2002 for the issuance of $10 million in conduit
revenue bonds for the same project, a $3.3 million forgivable loan,
conveyance of the "triangle site" to MPR, and the closure of a portion of
9th Street. At the last MPR Board of Trustees meeting, MPR indicated that
this would bring MPR's total long-term debt to "about $32 million." The HRA
staff report indicates MPR's stated intention to pay back the loans on the
$22 million bond issue through the use of capital campaign funds.

On November 16, SaveWCAL contacted the St. Paul HRA to inquire whether a
draft copy of the proposed HRA application for the MPR project was available
for public inspection prior the public hearing conducted by the HRA on
October 27. State law requires that a copy of this application must be
available for public inspection before the HRA conducts a public hearing on
the project and prior to the submission of the application to the state
Commissioner. 

On November 17, the St. Paul HRA informed us that, after speaking to their
bond attorney, the HRA has decided to hold another public hearing on
December 8. They apparently determined that the failure to have the proposed
application available for public inspection prior to the hearing on October
27 would render the process vulnerable to effective challenge.

The hearing on December 8 is open to the public, giving people an
opportunity to address the HRA Commissioners. The HRA Commissioners will be
especially interested in the comments of St. Paul residents.

SaveWCAL is urgently seeking volunteers with experience in public funding
issues. We are also seeking residents of St. Paul to testify at a public
hearing. Please email SaveWCAL (at) hotmail.com if you can assist us.

You can access copies of the St. Paul HRAs Report and the Resolution at:
http://www.SaveWCAL.org/pdf/StPaulHRA_Resolution.pdf
http://www.SaveWCAL.org/pdf/StPaulHRA_Report.pdf

Ruth Sylte '82 
SaveWCAL President 
for the board and volunteers of SaveWCAL

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to