I'd like to echo many of things that Mike has already pointed out: Wal-Mart has despicable labor practices that have been widely condemned, even in the mainstream. The issue isn't 'no jobs or Wal-Mart jobs'; Wal-Mart pushes out competition which offer better jobs and drives a 'race to the bottom', as many have noted, where only businesses who employ similar labor tactics can survive. Wal-mart sets a community standard which I feel is unacceptable. Also as Mike said, you may not be supporting Wal-Mart directly with your consumer dollars but you are supporting it with your citizen tax dollars. Many studies have shown that big boxes and other corporate chains like CVS and McDonalds end up being heavily subsidized by the residents of the community via property taxes, TIF, and other methods of indirect support (police and road services, etc). I'm not at my computer where I have those links, but they are easy enough to find online. Supporting Wal-Mart as a community whether we shop there or not is also unacceptable, as Wal-Mart contributes to the domination and exploitation of communities and workers world-wide through chains of production and extraction.

In addition, it is a myth that Wal-Mart provides the cheapest products. Again, many studies have shown that Wal-Mart follows a trend of moving into a community and offering cut-throat prices, then, after they have killed all the competition, raising their prices to higher than they were before. They may offer a few extraordinarily cheap items as loss-leaders, but the rest of their goods really aren't lower than elsewhere. And what low prices they do have come at the externalized costs of heinous labor and environmental policies throughout the life-cycle of a product.

To think that Wal-Mart operates in a free market is to be blind to the processes of control and subsidy that encourage and support the growth of large corporations and provide structural inhibitions to small businesses.

Renee Lepreau
Merriam Park

--On Thursday, December 30, 2004 3:43 PM -0600 Mike Fratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:rr

Boy Dennis., did you open a can of worms.  Why would someone want to
banish a business that provides $3.00 over minimum wage?  A place
where people can buy things at the lowest cost?

First of all, the last time I checked many fast food restaurants
were paying $9.00 and hour or more just to get employees.  Even the
kids don't want those jobs.  So paying $3.00 over minimum wage may
be a supply demand related rather then Walmart's largess.

IMHO:  The issue is how they are able to sell things at the lowest
cost possible.  The issue is also the businesses that have closed
due to the arrival of new Walmart.  In some ways, the issues are the
same as those related to the challenges to Microsoft.  Although
Microsoft does not pay any where near minimum wage.  It relates to
the ability to compete

The United States anti-trust laws were enacted to prevent
conglomerates running their competition out of town.  Wall Mart
seems to fit into the definitions related to anti-trust, yet their
tactics have not been challenged.

Frankly, I do not shop at Walmart.  Only been in two stores that I
can think of. I would love to be able to buy those things I want at
the cheapest possible price.  BUT..  There is a big but here.  In
order to do that I would have to support the importation of clothing
made in sweat shops.  I would have to buy cars built with cheap
labor in Mexico.  I would have to`buy into and believe that these
economic decisions made a difference to the worker rather then the
owner.

Yes there is a skill issue for many low wage employees, but not all
of them.  In many cases the people working in places like Walmart
are there because they can't get jobs they are trained for or they
are working two or three jobs just to make ends meet..

The one thing that is known is that employers who pay low wages
also pay little or no benefits.  It forces their employees to use
emergency and/or government services.  This, Dennis will have an
effect on your bottom line.  There will have to be an increase in
your taxes to cover these increased costs.

If you remember Henry Ford paid his employees enough so they could
buy his cars.  Now we have places like Walmart who pay their
employees so little they can't afford the even used cars if they
want to eat and have a roof over their heads.

Mike Fratto
President
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless
Payne Phalen

"Dennis Tester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/30/2004 2:46:35 PM



I don't own stock in Wal-Mart.  I've never shopped there, and I
doubt if I ever would, so frankly, I don't have a dog in this fight.
 That's what's great about the free market.  As a consumer, I can
choose to shop wherever I wish.  Fortunately, I have the means such
that I don't have to seek out the lowest prices to make my dollars
stretch further than they would otherwise.  And because I have
certain skills and abilities that pay top dollar in the labor
market, I will never have to settle for a job that pays $8 an hour,
which is probably what Wal-Mart pays to be competitive in the labor
market.

My point is, I thought people like Ms. Dickinson were supposed to
be advocates for the poor and working poor.  Why would she want to
banish a company that provides a place where people can buy at the
lowest possible price?  Why would she criticize an employer that
pays $3 over the minimum wage for basically unskilled labor?

It seems to me that poor and working class people benefit from
having a Wal-Mart around, given the alternative of paying higher
prices and/or having no job.

But I guess some people, like "film-makers" I suppose, have the
luxury of not having to think in those terms.


Dennis Tester Mac-Groveland



----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:11:03

I just wanted to let y'all know that the short (12
minute) video Ken Friberg
and I made on Wal-Mart in St. Paul ("Always Low")
has made it to the finals
of a contest in NY called "Media that Matters".
We're both pretty excited
about it!  The even shorter trailer's at
<http://www.alwayslow.org>

Cheers,

Elizabeth Dickinson
West Side
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:       [email protected]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your
password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [email protected]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [email protected]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/




_____________________________________________
To Join: St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [email protected]


To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to