> Hi Yamato, > > Would a -Z option (inverse -z) be o.k? Combining both -zZ will print > non-returning syscalls only.
-z! is just my random idea. -Z may be o.k. Dmitry may answer this. Masatake YAMATO > > Regards, > Burkhard > > -----Original Message----- > From: Masatake YAMATO [mailto:yam...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:48 > To: strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Kohl, Burkhard > <burkhard.k...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [strace-4.15] Proposal: Output Staging for -z Option (print > successful syscalls only) / Patch included > > Hi, > >> Output Staging for -z Option (print successful syscalls only) / Patch >> included > > Interesting idea, but I want logically reversed case: -z! Option (print > syscalls returning error), too. > > Masatake YAMATO > Intel Deutschland GmbH > Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany > Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de > Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter > Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau > Registered Office: Munich > Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
