On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:58:05PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> This patch is intended to implement this RFE:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
> 
> There are some patches for this, but apparently discussion
> on mailing list died out with no results. At least that bug
> is still open. Moreover, the patches are somewhat buggy.
> 
> I propose this patch.
> 
> I think in real-world usage people do not check strace usage in scripts. They
> just use it correctly, so that it doesn't exit(1) with usage info and whatnot.
> 
> But I know that when I try to debug something by replacing "cmd [args]"
> with "strace cmd [args]" the fact that it's sometimes a problem
> that parent does not see exit code of cmd but sees zero.
> 
> IOW: I do not think that there are users who will be adversely affected by 
> this
> change in behavior. Therefore I do not think adding a switch to enable this is
> worth it. It will be just a case of featuritis.
> 
> Problems this patch fixes compared to previous patches:
> 
> * strace returns exit code of straced process, *never its children*.
> * If child died from a signal, strace will (try to) die from the same signal.
> * strace -p <pid> is not affected (will exit 0 as before).

I think your idea how to implement this RFE is better than mine, so
I'm OK to install your patch with minor cleanup.

Objections?


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgp4MnSBtdEGa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to