On Monday 23 February 2009 22:39:33 Roland McGrath wrote: > No opinions here. Git is fine with me if the conversion doesn't lose > anything. Fortunately we have never used cvs branching to speak of, so > there are probably no headaches. I also would not object at all if people > wanted to move the hosting. (SF has been kind of spotty in my experience, > but tolerable.)
considering the only thing the strace project uses is mailing list, scm, and download, seems like a transfer would be more hassle. in other areas (like bug tracker), sf certainly sucks imo, but in these areas it seems to be ok. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
