On Tuesday 24 March 2009 21:44:25 Roland McGrath wrote: > Of course I understand LFS. I don't understand what you think is wrong nor > what you think you are fixing. Those are what need to precede any patch. > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 might be intractable for strace. It needs to decode > the 32-bit struct stat et al formats in the syscalls that use them. In the > case of stat, I guess it's a different kernel struct declaration for Linux > anyway. But I'm not sure that is true of all the LFS-affected types. > > You need to explain what you are attempting to gain from using > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.
i was missing the fact that strace builds with _GNU_SOURCE by default, and that in terms enables LFS support. so explicitly settings LFS defines is redundant. sorry for the noise. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
