On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:10:50AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 02:39:38PM +0100, Adrien Kunysz wrote:
> > Back in August I posted this patch that implements a new -C option. I
> > got some feedback and reworked the patch accordingly but I got no follow
> > up after the third iteration. Can you please consider this again or tell
> > me what's wrong with this? This version applies cleanly against the
> > current master branch.
> > 
> > This combine regular output with -c. I would find that useful to be
> > integrated in the master branch in order to get rid of some custom,
> > unreliable scripts I (and doubtlessy others) use to analyze regular
> > strace output.
> 
> The patch looked OK, but, unfortunately, only after the first glance.
> There are a lot of severe problems in trace_syscall() part of it.
> You can find a fixed patch at
> http://strace.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=strace/strace;a=commitdiff;h=ldv/option-C

No comments yet?


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgpuGr01HdRAu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to