On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 02:34:58PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > There is actually one case where the names differ: newfstatat > > vs. fstatat64. But that's the only one. > > Ah, right you are. That's a pretty stupid name difference, IMHO. > But it is what the __NR_* constants are called, which is as close > as we have to a single official name for Linux syscalls. I think > it wouldn't hurt to call it fstatat64 on ppc64 too. I also think > it wouldn't hurt to just use #ifdef __powerpc64__ in the one table. > But I also won't argue if you feel strongly that this is reason enough > to use arch=powerpc64 and separate files.
That's my concern, too. I'd rather avoid a full clone of powerpc/syscallent.h just because of this name difference. -- ldv
pgp6f6ElLVC6j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
