On 01/17/2012 08:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:01:00PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> On 01/17/2012 07:53 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > [...] >>> [X86_64] (x86_64_regs): Remove. >>> * syscall.c [X86_64] (x86_64_regs): Make static. >> >> I think we will eventually need register structs to be accessible >> from all files. That's why I made x86_64_regs global too, >> even though it does not have to be global (so far). >> >> I would like to ask for it to remain global. > > I'd probably agree, but the most astonishing thing is that global > x86_64_regs doesn't work for me at all: > > $ ./strace /bin/true > Segmentation fault
Mysterious... > So I suggest to make x86_64_regs static for now, just to make HEAD work > again. Meanwhile I'll try to investigate what's going on. Ok then, please do. -- vda ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
