On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:00:46PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 02:47 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >>>>> But I'd like to hear from Denys about PTRACE_SEIZE perspective first.
> >>>>> We surely won't release PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL code enabled by default 
> >>>>> because
> >>>>> the kernel API might change.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm going to ask kernel people to drop PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL.
> >>>
> >>> The patch was submitted in February, but current v3.3-rc6-240-gc7b2855
> >>> still insists on PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL.  Is there a prospect to release
> >>> without PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL any time soon, or should we rather leave this
> >>> experimental code disabled in the next release?
> >>
> >> It's in linux-next git:
> > [...]
> >> Looks like this change will go into linux-3.4
> >
> > So it is not going to be in a released kernel this spring?
> 
> I guess not.

OK, let's release without USE_SEIZE enabled then.  There is a lot of
stuff waiting since 4.6, more than enough to justify a release.  It's
such a pity we didn't have a policy to update the NEWS file along with
committing noteworthy changes.

What version should this release be, 4.6.1 or 4.7?


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgpVuQvubi3PG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to