On 5/7/2013 11:38 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:30:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 08:14:46 Chris Metcalf wrote: >>> > > On 5/6/2013 7:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: >>>> > > > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 03:21:38PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote: >>>>> > > >> The Xtensa architecture also used dedicated syscalls and doesn't >>>>> > > >> need to multiplex ipc and socket subcalls. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Applied, thanks. >>> > > >>> > > No new architecture will ever use the subcall model, so in fact it's >>> > > probably cleaner to just list the ones that do use it. >> > >> > yeah, i was thinking it might be better to move those ifdefs out of the >> > common >> > code and just declare it in the relevant syscallent.h header > Yes, something like this?
Rather than all the checks to see if SYS_socket_subcall has the right value, I'd just require all platforms to define it first, and then in linux/subcall.h, add an #ifndef to error out if it's not defined. -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
