Hi Mike, On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon 04 Aug 2014 08:35:02 zubin.mit...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Zubin Mithra <zubin.mit...@gmail.com> >> >> * desc.c (decode_select): Initialize fds to NULL. >> * strace.c (expand_tcbtab): Change type to unsigned. >> (startup_child): Initialize pathname array. > > you need to describe why you're making a change, not just how
Indeed, I'll make sure to add in descriptions from now on. > >> --- a/desc.c >> +++ b/desc.c >> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ decode_select(struct tcb *tcp, long *args, enum >> bitness_t bitness) { >> int i, j; >> int nfds, fdsize; >> - fd_set *fds; >> + fd_set *fds = NULL; >> const char *sep; >> long arg; > > why ? i guess you're handling the case where nfds==0 ? seems like fds is > used uninitialized in that case. > > however, if you do this, you'll see that the nfds<0 check also sets fds to > NULL, so you should delete that line. I was wondering if there could be a situation where nfds > 0 and the calculated fdsize would end up equal to 0. In such a case fds would be uninitialised. > >> --- a/strace.c >> +++ b/strace.c >> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ expand_tcbtab(void) >> callers have pointers and it would be a pain. >> So tcbtab is a table of pointers. Since we never >> free the TCBs, we allocate a single chunk of many. */ >> - int i = tcbtabsize; >> + unsigned int i = tcbtabsize; > > i guess this is because tcpbtabsize is unsigned, and i is only used to compare > to that. Indeed, its used to compare against the size so there didn't seem any reason to have it as a signed integer. > >> @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ startup_child(char **argv) >> { >> struct_stat statbuf; >> const char *filename; >> - char pathname[MAXPATHLEN]; >> + char pathname[MAXPATHLEN] = ""; >> int pid; >> struct tcb *tcp; > > i'm not seeing a problem here. pathname looks like it's always initialized > before it's used. note that sizeof(pathname) is not using the value of > pathname, so those checks don't count ... Ah indeed, I misunderstood(for some reason I was thinking of strcat instead of strcpy). This shouldn't be a problem. Thanks, -- zm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel