On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:48:34 +0530, Zubin Mithra <zubin.mit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Dmitry V. Levin <l...@altlinux.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:58:35PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Wed 06 Aug 2014 12:31:36 Masatake YAMATO wrote:
>> [...]
>>> > A problem is that many libraries wrapping netlink interface are
>>> > distributed under term of GPL or LGPL. I'm not sure the code using the
>>> > library is acceptable to strace project. If not acceptable, you have
>>> > to decode the packet of netlink by yourself.
>>>
>>> libnl is LGPL, so linking against it optionally should be OK (strace
> would
>>> still be BSD).  since it's actively developed and commonly used (by
> wireless
>>> tools), i'd start there.
>>
>> Looks like there are no other viable options but libnl.
> 
> Do we really need libnl? So far the code samples I have seen that does not
> use libnl seems fairly straightforward.
> 
> https://github.com/kristrev/inet-diag-example/blob/master/inet_monitor.c

https://github.com/kristrev/inet-diag-example/issues/1

Masatake YAMATO
 
> 
> Thanks,
> -- zm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to