On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:02:01PM +0530, haris iqbal wrote:
[...]
> Ok. I have come up with a separate memory model for tcbtab. In this
> model, we will use a linked list instead of a global array of pointers
> tcbtab.
> 
> The structure
> 
> struct s_tcbtab
> {
>     struct tcb* data;
>     struct s_tcbtab* next;
> }
> 
> And a global head of the linked list.
> 
> struct s_tcbtab* head_tcbtab = NULL;

I suppose this memory model is better for some use cases and worse for
some other use cases.
What kind of strace usage would win/lose from this change?


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgpgScW015ZRq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to