On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:01:58AM +0100, Seraphime Kirkovski wrote: > This extends the -e fault capability with a :signal option which > delivers a signal on entry of the specified syscall. > :error and :signal are mutually exclusive; it does not make sense to > interrupt a syscall with a signal and stipulate an error code. > Currently :signal has greater precedence than :error.
Are they really mutually exclusive? What if the signal is handled? Why can't we inject both a signal and a fault into the same syscall? -- ldv
pgpLhXtotg3bU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
