Hi Yamato, Would a -Z option (inverse -z) be o.k? Combining both -zZ will print non-returning syscalls only.
Regards, Burkhard -----Original Message----- From: Masatake YAMATO [mailto:yam...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:48 To: strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Kohl, Burkhard <burkhard.k...@intel.com> Subject: Re: [strace-4.15] Proposal: Output Staging for -z Option (print successful syscalls only) / Patch included Hi, > Output Staging for -z Option (print successful syscalls only) / Patch included Interesting idea, but I want logically reversed case: -z! Option (print syscalls returning error), too. Masatake YAMATO Intel Deutschland GmbH Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau Registered Office: Munich Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
strace-4.15i2.patch.tgz
Description: strace-4.15i2.patch.tgz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
