On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Israel vianney wrote: [...] > Please I 've gone through the tests and test folder in the source code > trying to understand the used format, I also checked on codecov what is > left to be done as for the testing, then noticed some files with 100% miss > but then in the cloned code the testing of those functions have been > implemented. So it got me alittle confused. Please I will apreciate if > someone can clarify things for me. I am not very verse with codecov. Thanks > in advance
That's simple: the system where we gather coverage (by running tests using strace built with configure option --enable-code-coverage) is provided by travis, it's quite old and doesn't implement quite a few modern kernel features. That's the reason for the discrepancy of ~2% you can see between the coverage displayed on codecov site and the coverage you can gather yourself on a system with a fresh linux kernel. -- ldv
pgpLLk2CSSMft.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
