On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:35:49PM +0530, Rishi Bhatt wrote: > Hey if i am taking rt_sigretrun,nanosleep as negative testcases i am > getting sigusr and sigalarm respectively, i should not get them right? > Also sched.test is also failing for them. Well i have included fstat and > open as negatives. > > The way these test is made which expect the last output to be > '+++ exited with 0 +++' -> this is causing the test failure for some tests > from the suite.Well should i work to make this test better or there is > something else which i am not taking into consideration?
Some test programs cannot be easily reused for this %clock test because
they fork, raise/catch signals, etc.
But hundreds of test programs are well fit for this test: their strace
output consists of syscalls and the final "exited" line only.
> From ba969213641b0c80defc908a6921ba4b498de0a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rishi Bhatt <bhatt.rishi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:41:55 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH v4] Implemented -e trace=%clock option
v4? Again?
[...]
> --- a/sysent.h
> +++ b/sysent.h
> @@ -22,5 +22,6 @@ typedef struct sysent {
> #define TRACE_INDIRECT_SUBCALL 02000 /* Syscall is an indirect
> socket/ipc subcall. */
> #define COMPAT_SYSCALL_TYPES 04000 /* A compat syscall that uses compat
> types. */
> #define TRACE_SCHED 010000 /* Trace scheduler-related syscalls. */
> +#define TRACE_CLOCK 020000 /*Trace clock-related syscalls. */
Unfortunately, I have to repeat myself:
"Please follow the style used in the file you are patching,
in particular, the style of comments."
--
ldv
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
