On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:02:33AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> while grouping I found that osf_statfs has following entries
>
> linux/alpha/syscallent.h:188:[160] = { 3, TF|TSF,
> SEN(osf_statfs), "osf_statfs" },
> linux/alpha/syscallent.h:233:[227] = { 3, TF|TSF,
> SEN(osf_statfs), "osf_statfs64" },
>
> Should the second entry be
> linux/alpha/syscallent.h:233:[227] = { 3, TF|TSF,
> SEN(osf_statfs64), "osf_statfs64" },
>
> and not
> linux/alpha/syscallent.h:233:[227] = { 3, TF|TSF,
> SEN(osf_statfs), "osf_statfs64" },No, I don't think so. There is a single parser for both syscalls: $ grep osf_statfs alpha.c SYS_FUNC(osf_statfs) This is a dumb parser, it doesn't decode neither struct osf_statfs nor struct osf_statfs64. > and then grouped under statfs64 ? > > If entry is correct what group should I put for this file statfs or statfs64 ? Why do you want to separate statfs and statfs64? -- ldv
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
