On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:26:41 +0300
"Dmitry V. Levin" <l...@altlinux.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:33:57AM +0300, Edgar Kaziakhmedov wrote:
> [...]
> > Actually, I am not quite sure about ARM architectures, am I right
> > there or not. (I mean ABI modes). Because, according to the current
> > syscallent.h file in arm dir, there is not support for subcall in
> > ARM EABI, is it correct? Because, in the kernel there is place for
> > these subcalls.  
> 
> That's simple.  If you have a look at the kernel, you'll see the
> following:
> 
> $ grep -Fw oabi arch/arm/tools/syscall.tbl
> # <num>       <abi>   <name>                  [<entry
> point>                        [<oabi compat entry point>]] #  common
> point>        - for system calls shared between oabi and eabi (may
> point>        have compat)
> #  oabi   - for oabi-only system calls (may have compat)
> # For each syscall number, "common" is mutually exclusive with oabi
> and eabi 13   oabi    time                    sys_time
> 22    oabi    umount                  sys_oldumount
> 25    oabi    stime                   sys_stime
> 27    oabi    alarm                   sys_alarm
> 30    oabi    utime                   sys_utime
> 76    oabi    getrlimit               sys_old_getrlimit
> 82    oabi    select                  sys_old_select
> 89    oabi    readdir                 sys_old_readdir
> 90    oabi    mmap                    sys_old_mmap
> 102   oabi    socketcall
> sys_socketcall                sys_oabi_socketcall 113
> oabi  syscall                 sys_syscall 117
> oabi  ipc                     sys_ipc
> sys_oabi_ipc
> 
> In other words, socketcall and ipc are implemented for oabi only,
> on eabi they return ENOSYS.
> 
> 

Yes, sure, however, am I right, that syscallent.h will be the same in
sense of first 398 syscalls for ARM OABI and for ARM EABI?
I'd say, that it'd be convinient to add #ifdef directive to syscalls,
that are purposed for just OABI mode, and in case of EABI fill them as
zero.

Attachment: pgpU8KjMjJD34.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to