On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:01:02PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > I'm planning to linke strace with libiberty for mangling C++ > symbol appearted in stack trace enabled with -k option. > > Both the names, xmalloc and xcalloc, are already used in the > library. Therefore I rename the symbols defined in strace.
Aren't xmalloc and xcalloc provided by strace compatible with those provided by libiberty? If strace also provided xrealloc, would it be sufficient for libiberty? If for any reason we'd have to rename these functions in strace, would it be enough just to add renaming macros, e.g. to xmalloc.h? > --- > bpf.c | 2 +- > count.c | 4 ++-- > dyxlat.c | 4 ++-- > filter_qualify.c | 2 +- > mmsghdr.c | 2 +- > number_set.c | 2 +- > pathtrace.c | 2 +- > perf.c | 4 ++-- > strace.c | 4 ++-- > syscall.c | 4 ++-- > unwind.c | 8 ++++---- > util.c | 4 ++-- > xmalloc.c | 6 +++--- > xmalloc.h | 4 ++-- > 14 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) -- ldv
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
