On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote:

> Both Obama/Biden and McCain/Palin are qualified to be President/Vice
> President.

Strictly speaking, yes, each one of them is qualified to be Veep. All  
are over 35, all are native-born American citizens.

Beyond that Sarah Palin is no more qualified to be VP than I am,  
possibly less, because she appears to be less informed about current  
events and existing American politics than I am.

 From what we've discovered of her governing style:

18 months in office and having officially been found of abusing her  
powers for personal gain, immediately starting off with measures to  
evade the very transparency she campaigned for, by conducting official  
government business on private email systems *explicitly* to evade  
subpoena. This is public record, she cannot hide this. The Yahoo  
emails where she and her staff explicitly discuss subpoenas were among  
those released to the committee in september.

persisting in public statements on her record (the infamous bridge to  
nowhere) when there is video of her publicly expressing the exact  
opposite of what she said, and when the public record contradicts her  
statements.

She believes, or at least is pretending to believe, if you want to get  
deeply cynical, that there are 'Pro-American' *parts* of the country,  
implying that there are *anti* American parts of the country. 
<http://www.drudge.com/news/113787/palin-loves-pro-america-parts-us 
 >

(If DRUDGE is reporting this this way, she's lost Matt Drudge; the  
republicans are in deep shit.)

Contrary to popular belief, blind allegiance to the leaders and nation  
is not patriotism, not in a democracy.

"My country right or wrong" is not a virtue in a democracy. (And  
wasn't even the correct quote...)

Patriots don't say that, only subjects.

It is our duty as citizens to speak out when our country is wrong. It  
is our duty as citizens to work to change things when it is wrong.

Even in wartime, much less the ongoing, ill-defined, constant 'war on  
a tactic' thing we have going on, because when our country is wrong it  
hurts us all.

It damages this country that I love, and I refuse to stand idly by and  
let it happen just because some yahoo with a bullhorn or an email  
account tells me I'm not a patriot or that I hate America.

Fuck that noise. This is too important.



> One ticket wants to lead from a far left perspective, the
> other slightly right of the middle.


>
> Everyone should try to be a little more mindful of those things when
> spouting off in support of their preferred candidate. Put that broad
> paint brush away, and note it is possible to praise one candidate
> without besmirching the other and his supporters.


Yes, absolutely, 45% of the country is "far left".

A) Take your own advice there, Francis.

B) If you think that a mainstream centrist Democrat like Obama is "far  
left" you wouldn't know "far left" if it came up and bit you on the  
ass. Seriously.  Consider your biases. By your reckoning, Eisenhower  
was a marxist.

--
Bruce Johnson

"No matter where you go, there you are", B. Banzai


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to