On Oct 20, 2008, at 12:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The extremely low-class Mr. 10 mm wrote:

Correction:  upper-middle class

But you can continue to dislike me, like you dislike the lower-class.

>> On Oct 20, 2008, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Folks aren't so much afraid of Obama as they are the thugs that
>>> support him. There's a few of those on this list, and a whole bunch
>>> of them in ACORN and the Nation of Islam.
>>
>> If ACORN is so evil, and the subject of the same fraud crap in '04  
>> and
>> '06 by Republicans (both times disproved), why did John McCain speak
>> at an ACORN event in February 2006, lavishing them with praise?   
>> Seems
>> a bit hypocritical.  Oh yeah, McCain is just a puppet, with the Bush
>> campaign team elbow-deep in his puckered starfish working the
>> controls.  Sad to see McCain sell out his name, honor, and reputation
>> to become a neo-con puppet.
>>      -W
>
> Speaking of Obama thugs, look who piped up.

Yeah, that's rich coming from the Rethuglican version of a chihuahua:  
incessant yapping, and scared shitless by the blowing wind.

> This thread is about the similarities between Obama's tax plan and a  
> negative income tax proposed by Milton Friedman in the '80's. It  
> sure doesn't sound like you know anything about either one of them.

Your mischaracterization of Obama's tax plan isn't worthy a response,  
besides, it's you who mentioned ACORN.  Instead of answering my  
question, you choose the typical Rethuglican tactic of diversion.

To answer your question, Obama isn't talking about giving money to  
people with meager incomes, he's talking about reducing their payroll  
tax.  Huge difference.

> John McCain's campaign doesn't mind talking about the specifics of  
> his tax plan. Why do you nasty Obama supporters get all uppity when  
> folks want details of his tax plan? Got something to hide?

No.  Obama's tax plan is pretty cut and dry, yet you and your party  
repeatedly try, and fail, to make it something it isn't.

McCain's tax plan is clearly one of trickle-down economics, which  
didn't work in the Reagan, Bush Sr, or Bush Jr administrations.  What  
makes you think it will work for McCain?

> You probably do.

Oooooh, burn!
      -W



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to