On Jan 21, 2009, at 3:08 PM, mex sara wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Francis Drouillard  
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> So, when are you holier-than-thou Aussies gonna pony up an  
> Aborigine to lead your country?
>
> actually  i wasn't thinking  so much about race but

The symbolism of a black man becoming POTUS is significant.

> the call to individual responsibility

A value conservatives promote.

> and
> citizenship that is inclusive rather than exclusive

Not sure what the hell that nonsense means. We're Americans. We're  
inclusive.

> the ethics for lobbyists et al signed today

Mere paper and largely meaningless.

> the changes in Guantanamo  re: the military trials etc

How many is Australia willing to take, try and imprison? How many are  
they willing to loose on their streets?

> etc

Etc? There's more?

> i wonder if you have heard of the Intervention ?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/74rntu

Copycats!

> political race relations are at least 50 years behind those in the USA

Political? Why don't Australian citizens put a stop to it?

> remembering that the vote for aborigines was only given in 1967
> and this
>
> http://www.esjgws.org.au/issues/reconciliation/stolen.htm

We didn't enforce that right with black Americans (formerly Black  
Americans) until 1965, so you aren't lagging as far behind as you  
might think.

> so i think it will be a little while before there is a catch up but  
> quite possibly
> the person who will be head of Her Magesty's Government in  
> Australia and
> and has an  Aborigional heritage has been born ...  who knows
> it probably wont happen in my lifetime, it might  though

As long as he (or she) stays up on their boomerang skills they'll do  
just fine.

> i am still holding my breath for the republic .. but a republic is  
> unlikely till
>
> HRH Prince Charles is KIng

Shoot for one of the younger princes.

Oops, bad choice of words.


>
>
>
> mx
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:37 PM, mex sara wrote:
>
>> i can't not believe on one of the most redemptive days not only in  
>> your country but
>> perhaps only surpassed in my life once or twice ...
>>
>> not only in respect to the quickness of the turn of history
>> but also in the potential for the culture shift
>> surely
>> if the stockmarket drops in relation to that well i guess its part  
>> of the
>> ebb and flow of rich mens fancy and rich white men have lost a bit  
>> of control
>> they are bound to sell ... in your new government  you have jewish  
>> ladies, a mormon
>> and african americian President probably even  atheists and  
>> catholics perhaps
>>
>>
>> if to score a point all that can be  brought up at such a time is  
>> the problems caused by those greedy corporate [noun self  
>> censored]   rather than a culture shift that might
>> make everybody's life better ... well frankly  no i wont grace it  
>> with an explanation of
>> how it makes me feel it would be undignified
>>
>> mx
>>
>> ps when i saw the oil fiend cheney i realized i hadn't seen him  
>> for years and i realized why
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Largest Inaugural Day loss in history:
>>
>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news? 
>> pid=20601087&refer=worldwide&sid=aOYw.awwsNSg>
>>
>> Welcome, Obama!
=
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to