On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:03 AM, mex sara wrote:

> daily mail is a very conservative paper ...  house of lords and all that 

So what? The author's analysis is spot on, and dismissing it because it was 
published in a conservative paper is intellectually lazy. 

As is continuing to blame Bush for poor policies implemented by the 
Obama/Reid/Pelosi cabal, richardsan. And your persistent raising of strawmen 
doesn't help your argument any. Obama has followed, indeed amplified, the worst 
of Bush's crony capitalism policies and has thrust the nation further into debt 
and greatly expanded government intrusion into our daily lives.

The issue now is Obama's administration, and record numbers of Americans 
believe our country is heading in the wrong direction under his leadership (if 
that's what you can call it). His policies have failed elsewhere in the world 
and at other times in our past.

Federal spending and more federal control isn't the cure -- it's the ailment. A 
smaller, conservative and less expensive constitutional federal government is 
needed.

> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:57 AM, richard lo piccolo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote:
> 
> > This UK writer nails it:
> >
> > <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1312527/Is-Barack-Obama-socialist-No-hes-worse-that.html?ito=feeds-newsxml>
> >
> > Despite what the 29-percenters that frequent this list argue, Obama in a 
> > socialist and Americans don't like where he and the leftist/statist 
> > Reid/Pelosi Democrats are taking us. Oops, make that the 27-percenters:
> >
> > <http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll>
> >
> > So far, all these dolts have been able to argue is "it's BUSH'S!!! fault" 
> > or "Republicans are blocking us" or "we haven't spent enough fast enough" 
> > or "we need more time."
> what a fuckin loony.
> 
> so your point, is to deny the history of." why we are /where we are"?
> 8 years of republican mess making will take longer than the 2 years obama has 
> been in office, trying to work on this epic failure authored by republicans.
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "StrataList-OT" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "StrataList-OT" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

Reply via email to