On May 19, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote:

> Ben Stein wasn't defending DSK. He was asking questions about the way the 
> case has been handled. A quote from his original article:


He was asking questions like this:

"People accuse other people of crimes all of the time. What do we know about 
the complainant besides that she is a hotel maid? I love and admire hotel 
maids. They have incredibly hard jobs and they do them uncomplainingly. I am 
sure she is a fine woman. On the other hand, I have had hotel maids that were 
complete lunatics, stealing airline tickets from me, stealing money from me, 
throwing away important papers, stealing medications from me. How do we know 
that this woman's word was good enough to put Mr. Strauss-Kahn straight into a 
horrific jail? Putting a man in Riker's is serious business. Maybe more than a 
few minutes of investigation is merited before it's done."

"The prosecutors say that Mr. Strauss-Kahn "forced" the complainant to have 
oral and other sex with him. How? Did he have a gun? Did he have a knife? He's 
a short fat old man. They were in a hotel with people passing by the room 
constantly, if it's anything like the many hotels I am in. How did he 
intimidate her in that situation? And if he was so intimidating, why did she 
immediately feel un-intimidated enough to alert the authorities as to her 
story?"

Puleeze. He did everything but say "She asked for it, the slut!"

That's not 'asking how the case had been handled.' That's advocating for this 
guy being treated differently BECAUSE he's wealthy and influential. Stein has 
NO BASIS in fact for his claims, unless he's got some inside information from 
the NYPD on this case, who would certainly take the time to make a few moments 
of investigation here...

See also:

<http://www.samefacts.com/2011/05/crime-control/dsk-and-bhl/>

"Presumed innocent has to do with what the government can do to you, not what 
people think of you, and Mark has a point about setting you up for pictures in 
handcuffs, pictures that cannot be untaken if you aren’t convicted. There is no 
requirement that citizens believe anything at all, including “innocent”, about 
an accused."

-- 
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

Reply via email to