On May 23, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Brian Lawson wrote: > >> My question is if the 1967 borders are so indefensible, how is it that >> Israel managed to defend them in 1967? Wouldn't the country be non-exisitant >> if they truly were indefensible? > > Oh that's so clever, Brian! Spoken like a true anti-Semite.
Exactly what makes my question anti-semitic? Yes, I did quote a Jew but that is irrelevant to the question I asked. > My question is how you know more about defending Israel that a former Israeli > commando? And the current PM that is sworn to protecting Israeli life and > property? You don't. l never made any claims to knowing anything about defending Israel or any other country. Where did you get that from? All I did is point out the fallacy in the argument put forward. > And how do you know that the intentions of Hamas and Fatah are peaceful, > particularly when their charter calls for the destruction of the Jewish > state? You don't. I don't recall saying anything about Hamas or Fatah. Where did you get the from? > And why should the Jews trust the "Palestinians?" They shouldn't. The Arabs > living in Gaza and the West Bank have never lived up to any agreement they've > ever had with the Jews. They just make promises that dupe those willing to > accept Jewish blood in the name of "peace." Did I say anything about trusting anybody? Where did you get that from? Once again, all I did is point out an illogical argument. > There is a path to peace in the Middle East, and that is complete and > unwaivering US support for Israel, something we haven't seen since 1949. > > Face it, the so-called Palestinians are a tool of the Arab states. If they > were truly worried about their plight, they'd have offered them a homeland in > Egypt or Jordan or elsewhere on the Arabian peninsula. The fact is, other > Arabs don't want to live with the Palestinians. Now who's making claims to know what is in the heads of others? Hint - it wasn't me. Once again, instead of answering the question asked, you make up things to attack the questioner. Let's try this again, if the 1967 borders are so indefensible, wouldn't Israel have been unable to defend them in 1967? Doesn't the fact that they were defended successfully mean that they are in fact defensible? -- Brian Lawson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
