On Jul 29, 2011, at 7:28 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >> >> are you serious? >> that doesn't make sense to you? >> sigh, the provincialism of the Californian..... > > We have a one party system here in California. Unfortunately, it's the party > that can't stop squandering money on public employees.
Reality raises it's far leftist socialislamofascistkenyan head again: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Assembly> 52 Democrats, 27 Republicans <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Senate> 25 Democrats, 15 Republicans I know that people deride California as the loony tunes state, and I begin to understand why now. You cannot possibly state with a straight face that "California is a 'one party state'" You have elections, no? I suppose the Red Guard of Berkley arm themselves up with the New Black Panthers, and La Raza every other November and viciously threaten all the god-fearing conservatives with horrors unimaginable, at gunpoint. Why I heard they once force people to eat ARUGULA!!!! The central feature of California's government for decades now has been that a minority of the Legislature has been effectively veto power over increases, while California's referendum system has allowed the people of the state to bypass the Legislature to approve increased spending. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
