Typical big govenment liberal. Doesn't mind seeing half a billion of other people's money pissed away. Obama turned a $300 million private sector loss into a $537 million taxpayer loss.
This wasn't an honest mistake by Obama. It was a political pay off that blew up in his face. True desperation on the issue belongs to douche-baggers that defend such crony capitalism when it was known venture would fail, or attempt to blame it on the Bush administration. Solyndra wasn't achieving anything that was worth the risk Obama exposed taxpayers to: <http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/09/solyndra-was-just-a-bad-bet-from-the-beginning/245673/> Keep making excuses for Obama and the crooks at Solydra, though. And keep your fingers crossed that Solyndra officials pleading the fifth won't make your boy look bad. > Francis, I know you've got a desperate, desperate, aching, 'call your doctor > it's lasted more than four hours' hard-on to GET Obama, but you're going to > be waiting a long, long time. This doesn't even rise to the level of > Travel-gate on the scale of things...The loan was vetted by the agencies > involved, promoted by TWO administrations, investors on the project donated > as much or more to Republican causes as Democrats, and ultimately, the > company went under because their product was not cheap enough to compete with > conventional solar technology by the time they got into production. > > This is not a scandal, no matter how much smoke you, Faux News and Darrel > Issa try to blow up everyone's ass. > > Look when you find DRUDGE debunking it, give the fuck up.... > > <http://www.drudge.com/news/148719/matzzie-theres-no-solyndra-scandal> > > Damn that reality and it's leftist bias: > > <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-matzzie/solyndra-scandalmongering_b_980860.html> > > And here, in a nutshell, is WHY Soplyndra couldn't compete with conventional > solar all of a sudden: > > <http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/Solar%20Background%20Document%205.pdf> > > Gee, it would appear that, contrary to the position taken by the right wing > of THIS country, the Chinese government is actually interested in promoting > business in theirs. > > Straight-up Keynesian economics and lo and behold, it works... > > <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/solar-energy/index.html> > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wind_turbine_manufacturers> > > Chinese firms account for almost one third of the world market share for Wind > turbines. > > There's only ONE US firm on the list. > > -- > Bruce Johnson > University of Arizona > College of Pharmacy > Information Technology Group > > Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > > > Francis Drouillard, PE Novato, CA 94945 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
