On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:41 AM, richardsan wrote:

> 
> is this legislation over reaching as far as 'laws already on the books'...?

Absolutely. DMCA takedowns can be sent and there are no real penalties for 
frivolous or erroneous takedown notices, but at least there's some form of due 
process.

Neither PIPA or SOPA offer these. While they claim to have removed the more 
draconian parts of SOPA (The domain-killer provision) there is still no system 
of due process; these laws can be used a cudgels by that increasingly smaller 
pool of mega-media companies to turn the internet into a one way street.

(And I'd show you a link to that list, but, you can't get there today...it's 
gone, just as if some media corporate person decided that it infringed on their 
copyrights)

And this is all still a gigantic protection racket for dead-as-a-dinosaur 
business models of Big Media. (which have been disproven again and again, most 
recently, and spectacularly by Louis CK:

<https://buy.louisck.net/news>

In a few weeks he made a million bucks, by not treating people like criminals. 

The music industry have been completely changed by the advent of electronic 
distribution: Napster did not so much due to legal action by the labels but the 
overwhelming success of the iTunes music store, which gave people a completely 
legal way to buy the music they wanted at a price the wanted. 

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but the basic thing is people, as a 
rule, don't want the hassle of finding and downloading music, movies or tv 
shows of dubious quality through bitorrent. The REASON they resort to it is 
that unlike Louis CK, the media corporate persons want to control wha=ich of my 
devices I see things on, where I can see things in the world, what VERSION of 
something I can see. 

They want their ultimate fantasy of charging me for EVERY TIME I listen to or 
view their "property". To do this they have to kill the internet dead, and 
revive it as their zombie one-way conduit. 

SOPA and PIPA are bad laws that will not achieve their stated aim (protection 
of intellectual property from online piracy), but will achieve their intended 
one (subordination of all content producers to the big media corporate 
persons)...they want to turn the internet off, and make it  like broadcast tv. 
Goodbye Youtube, goodbye Etsy, goodbye Wikipedia, hell, under the laws as 
they're being proposed, quite probably, goodbye Google.

And this doesn't even touch on the 'criminalizing civil copyright violations' 
provisions. Under these laws of Disney decides ythey don't like your satirical 
use of Mickey Mouse they can throw your ass in prison. 


-- 
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

Reply via email to