On Jan 29, 2012, at 4:44 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > >> >> On Jan 29, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >> >>> ... this is one that the voters are better suited to decide. >>> >>> <http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2012/01/arizona-candidate-with-survival-english-appeals-court-decision.html> >>> >>> If they're dumb enough to elect her then they deserve the tool for the >>> party she'll be in the House. >> >> Do you ever actually READ the articles you're posting? > > Fuck you, Bruce.
No thanks, I'm straight. > >> >> She's running for city council in a tiny town in Arizona, not the House. > >> >> The article makes NO mention of what party she's a member of, > > Neither did I. You did, asshole. Really? care to point out where? You said, and I quote: "they deserve the tool for the party she'll be in the House." You made no mention of *which* party you think she'll be a tool for, but knowing your biases, it's really not all that hard to infer. And, "in the House"; capitalized, it has a specific meaning, either the national or state House of Representatives. She's running for City Council. > >> which is not surprising since most cities in Arizona have non-partisan >> elections for city office. She could well be a small-government conservative >> railing against a spendthrift mayor. >> > > So what? People that elected her would have to live with the result. That's generally what people tend to believe when they elect someone. Kind of a fundamental tenet of democracy... -- Bruce Johnson "Wherever you go, there you are" B. Banzai, PhD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
