You're kidding right? No legal basis for contesting the illegal inclusion of a candidate on a ballot? Wow. -- Brian
On Feb 4, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > What about it? They're trying something bad so we should be allowed to do so, > too? That's rather childish logic. > > You may not like it, but White and his legal team are working within the > constraints of the law. There is no legal basis or precedent for the > Democrats grab for power. > > On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Brian Lawson wrote: > >> What about the state law that particular candidate broke in order to get his >> name on the ballot in the first place? Funny how Republicans think a D-class >> felony conviction should result in misdemeanor punishment so he can keep his >> illegally gained position. I thought you guys were the ones who are all >> about "law and order" and "actions have consequences". >> -- >> Brian >> >> On Feb 4, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >> >>> Funny how the Democrats want to circumvent state law and replace the choice >>> of the voters with the Democratic candidate they rejected. That says a lot >>> about today's Democratic Party and those that support them. >>> >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> <http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/indiana-sec-of-state-convicted-on-voter-fraud> >>>> >>>> I can only say <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObZaVgoX0zM> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
