On May 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2012, at 9:54 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Largely due to alternative media:
>>
>> <http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/01/how_i_learned_not_to_deny_climate_change_114017.html>
>>
>> BTW, the warmthers tried to stifle their fellow scientist Hans Svensmark,
>> who has a competing theory of what drives Earth's climate. Seems his theory
>> is far more reliable than the crap being shoveled by the Gore/Mann/Jones
>> cabal.
>>
>> But the warmthers and their disciples have an agenda that involves bigger
>> government, more bureaucracies and less individual liberty. They know their
>> policies won't have any measurable effect on climate, but they don't give a
>> shit. They just want to advance their tyrannical progressive cause.
>
> I"m going to go with the huffing theory...
Or maybe the straw man argument. (Skeptics deny climate change.)
Or ride the bandwagon. (Everyone knows it's true!)
Or a phony appeal to authority. (All credible scientists agree that
anthropogenic CO2 is adversely affecting climate.)
Or composition/division. (It's true that CO2 is a GHG, therefore it's true that
CO2 increases warm the Earth.)
Or Texas sharpshooting. ("Hide the decline.")
Or the false cause. (Increased levels of anthropogenic CO2 lead to global
warming climate change.)
Or the appeal to emotion. (The polar bears are dying!)
Or ad hominem attacks. (They're funded by the oil companies! The rich! The Kock
brothers!)
Or tu quoque (You deniers will never accept any proof of global warming climate
change.)
Oh yeah, thanks Mugsy!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
