Yeah, that makes things look a lot better for you scum sucking sycophant Democrats. Especially when you consider that Walker ran unopposed.
Face it, Democrats and their bought public union thugs ain't for the little guy -- they're for feeding off the public trough at the expense of everyone else. On May 11, 2012, at 11:01 AM, richardsan wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Bischoff <[email protected]> > wrote: > > "Primaries were last Tuesday, Walker received more votes than the all the > opposition combined..." > accordingly: > "http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/149767225.html"; > "YOU LIE" > /"republican shout out"... > > democratic totals...390,109+228,940+26,926+19,471+4,842 + ='s 670288 > > walker='s 626,538 > > don't fuck with the mathematically challenged=...; ^)...also, that total > doesn't take into account the one challenger (also in opposition to walker) > of 19,920 votes!!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
