On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]>wrote:
> I wish our Coastal Commission would ditch their "3-foot by 2100" estimate
> of sea level rise. That phony number is being used to unnecessarily deny
> people the use of their property. They extrapolate that phony number into a
> phony accelerated bluff retreat rate. They then argue that because the
> bluff retreat will make the parcel undevelopable in 75 years, it's
> undevelopable now. Furthermore, they insist that most people knew (or
> should have known) that the lot was undevelopable (due to phony numbers)
> and therefore their action does not constitute a "taking" under the US
> Constitution.
>
...you *get the kind of government interference that you vote for...*
> The Charter of the California Coastal Commission is good -- prevent
> private property owners from blocking beach access or from destroying
> coastal resources (wetlands and ESHA). But when environmental extremists
> took over the commission they began abusing their power by using the
> Coastal Act to stop development under any pretext possible.
>
and you can't have it both ways...
--
knowledge and wisdom come from knowing a ""republican conservative"" is an
oxymoron.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
