Wow, your arrogance is astounding. How dare you accuse me of not "giving a shit" about the Mexican citizens or the US Border Patrol agent killed by those guns. When the hell did I ever say any such thing or that it didn't happen or that no one should be held accountable?
It seems to me that you did not bother to read the article. It squarely places the blame right where it belongs, on the permissive AZ gun laws that allows anyone to by as many guns as they want of any type for any reason as long as they sign a form saying it is for "personal use". Even when you can then "change your mind" and sell those same guns to anyone you please immediately after leaving the gun shop. And on the US Attorney Office who denied permission for the ATF agents to arrest those who they knew were running the guns into Mexico and sat on warrants for wire taps to track the money sources. "If you did care, you'd want to know who was responsible for implementing such an operation. You'd want to know why it wasn't vetted. " The article also shows that this was properly vetted. If you did care, you'd read the article with an open mind rather than dismissing it as liberal propaganda and cover up. You wouldn't ignore the facts presented just because they don't fit your predefined (I mean, Fox News defined, also clearly delineated in the article ) opinions about this. When did I say ANYTHING about Obama or Holder? This thread is the first time I have ever had anything to say about this subject. And yet you insist upon putting words into my mouth and proclaiming that you know all about my beliefs and then accuse me of all kinds of crap based upon your baseless, fact less accusations. As for not releasing the papers requested by congress, since when has any responsible law enforcement agency released their papers on any ongoing investigation? That would be irresponsible, especially to an organization who wouldn't hesitate to release anything from it, even if taken out of context, to bolster their case. And, FYI, I absolutely do believe in congressional oversight of the Administrative and Judicial branches of government. I don't believe in using that as a political cudgel to score points for purely political reasons. Especially when those reasons are based on outright lies and distortions of the facts. Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Or molesting your children? See how it works? Baseless accusations and personal attacks in a form you can't even defend. They mean absolutely nothing and refusing to answer such ridiculous charges is not proof that you are still beating your wife and molesting your children or that you have something to hide. Your argument about national security doesn't hold water either since you don't know what national security interests are at stake and you never will prior to the release of the documents. Of course, if there were national security interests revealed by their release you could then accuse the administration of not protecting them by having released the documents. BTW, it was you who tried to split hairs by your selective editing of Bruce's original post. And as per your usual tactics, instead of discussing the facts and responding to my post directly, you resort to personal attacks and make up shit about me. You assume you know what I think and how I feel then proceed to belittle me based on your erroneous assumptions. -- Brian On Jun 27, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > Splitting hairs looks a lot like flailing on your part. > > Obama suckups have denied that "Fast &Furious" was of any consequence for > over 18 months. They still do. They -- and you -- tried to ignore the story > because it might make your boy president look bad. You didn't give a shit and > still don't give a shit about the Mexicans citizens or US Border agent killed > by those guns. Much easier to convince yourself it didn't happen, or that > Holder or Obama shouldn't be held responsible for an idiotic operation that > occurred on their watch. > > If you did care, you'd want to know who was responsible for implementing such > an operation. You'd want to know why it wasn't vetted. You'd want the > responsible agent "frog-marched" to prison. > > But you're all a bunch of f*cking hypocrites when it comes to Obama and his > lap dog Holder, so you don't want to know. Instead, you mock others that want > to know. Well screw you! > > Holder will now have to provide the documents. If he doesn't, Boehner can sue > and Holder will have to provide the requested documents to a judge, who will > look at them and determine if executive privilege applies. > > If needed to protect a vital national interest, executive privilege applies. > If needed protect the Holder DOJ or the Obama administration from > embarrassment, then executive privilege doesn't apply. > > Holder or Obama could have diffused it several months ago if they had nothing > to hide. They richly deserve all embarrassment they're bringing on themselves. > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Brian Lawson wrote: > >> Nice editing BTW. What he said did not happen is "the ATF _intentionally_ >> (emphasis mine) let guns into mexico?" >> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
