Hey, Aaron. I was waiting to see if anybody else would respond to this. (Didn't mean to wait so long, though.) If you write the patch, I'd be happy to commit it.
-Ben Aaron Porter wrote: > I just spent a while figuring out why my field "test" wasn't running through > binding. It turned out > that I wasn't thinking and named my default handler test as well. > > Could we get a warning or error message when the parameter which specifies > which handler to call has > an associated value? It seems like I've run into this same problem before. > > I'd be happy to code up a patch. > > Thanks! > Aaron > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Stripes-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development
