[ http://mc4j.org/jira/browse/STS-273?page=comments#action_10689 ] 
            
John Newman commented on STS-273:
---------------------------------

Yeah i debated on whether or not the sourcePage should be included by default, 
but I am not in a position to make that decision.  So I decided to go with a 
less invasive, backwards compatible approach.  It would be nice if it were 
switched to sourcePage="true" to be turned on only if the client needs it.  I 
can't really see that happening, validation on a GET is not very common I would 
think.


> The "stripes:link" tag should not add "_sourcePage" parameter when the page 
> requires a pre-action
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STS-273
>                 URL: http://mc4j.org/jira/browse/STS-273
>             Project: Stripes
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tag Library
>            Reporter: Taras Puchko
>         Assigned To: Tim Fennell
>         Attachments: noSourcePage.patch
>
>
> The "stripes:link" tag should not add "_sourcePage" parameter when the page 
> requires a pre-action, because in case of validation errors the page will be 
> called directly. 
> Possible solution is to add an optional boolean tag attribute and configure 
> default value in web.xml.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://mc4j.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Stripes-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development

Reply via email to