[ http://mc4j.org/jira/browse/STS-102?page=all ]

Ben Gunter resolved STS-102.
----------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix
      Assignee: Ben Gunter  (was: Tim Fennell)

This seems to work well as an add-on so I'll close this issue as Won't Fix.

> Security Annotation
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: STS-102
>                 URL: http://mc4j.org/jira/browse/STS-102
>             Project: Stripes
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: ActionBean Dispatching
>            Reporter: Nic Holbrook
>         Assigned To: Ben Gunter
>         Attachments: DispatcherServlet.java, DispatcherServlet.patch, 
> DispatcherServlet.patch, Secure.java, Secure.patch, 
> StripesAuthorizationException.java, StripesSecurityManager.java
>
>
> I didn't see anything in the documentation relating to security.  I was 
> thinking that with the annotations, it would be easy to implement a role 
> based security model for each of the action classes.  We would just need a 
> security interface to implement and we could set it up something like this.
> @Secure(role="users, powerusers", securityProvider="com.my.security.Provider")
> This way, we would handle the security and the methods or action itself could 
> be locked down.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://mc4j.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Stripes-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development

Reply via email to