Revision: 778
          http://stripes.svn.sourceforge.net/stripes/?rev=778&view=rev
Author:   bengunter
Date:     2008-01-20 18:52:38 -0800 (Sun, 20 Jan 2008)

Log Message:
-----------
Working toward a fix for STS-391. The layout-render tag works correctly with 
EVAL_BODY_INCLUDE instead of EVAL_BODY_BUFFERED so I've changed that.

Modified Paths:
--------------
    trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/tag/layout/LayoutRenderTag.java

Modified: 
trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/tag/layout/LayoutRenderTag.java
===================================================================
--- trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/tag/layout/LayoutRenderTag.java   
2008-01-21 02:38:24 UTC (rev 777)
+++ trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/tag/layout/LayoutRenderTag.java   
2008-01-21 02:52:38 UTC (rev 778)
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
  */
 package net.sourceforge.stripes.tag.layout;
 
-import net.sourceforge.stripes.controller.StripesFilter;
 import net.sourceforge.stripes.exception.StripesJspException;
 import net.sourceforge.stripes.tag.StripesTagSupport;
 
@@ -23,7 +22,6 @@
 import javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.BodyContent;
 import javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.BodyTag;
 import javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.DynamicAttributes;
-import java.net.URL;
 import java.util.Stack;
 
 /**
@@ -68,7 +66,7 @@
     @Override
     public int doStartTag() throws JspException {
         pushPageContextAttributes(this.context.getParameters());
-        return EVAL_BODY_BUFFERED;
+        return EVAL_BODY_INCLUDE;
     }
 
     /**


This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the 
world's largest Open Source development site.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Stripes-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development

Reply via email to