Hi

I would prefer to keep DelegatingExceptionHandler.Packages so old code  
still runs.
If it's not specified then try and use the Extension.Packages..

/Jeppe

On 31/01/2008, at 14.05, Tim Fennell wrote:

> Is it wise to remove the DelegatingExceptionHandler.Packages?  This
> just replaced an existing property that was available in 1.4.x called
> DEH.PackageFilters.  Anyone who built stuff this way will now have to
> specify those packages as extension packages...which might be ok, but
> might not?  Thoughts?
>
> -t
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Revision: 820
>>         http://stripes.svn.sourceforge.net/stripes/?rev=820&view=rev
>> Author:   bengunter
>> Date:     2008-01-30 21:28:16 -0800 (Wed, 30 Jan 2008)
>>
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> Fixed STS-482 and STS-497. DelegatingExceptionHandler no longer
>> attempts to instantiate abstract classes. The
>> DelegatingExceptionHandler.Packages config property that was
>> previously added for 1.5 has been removed in favor of the even newer
>> Extension.Packages property supported by BootstrapPropertyResolver.
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>>   trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/exception/
>> DelegatingExceptionHandler.java
>>
>> Modified: trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/exception/
>> DelegatingExceptionHandler.java
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/exception/
>> DelegatingExceptionHandler.java      2008-01-31 04:49:08 UTC (rev 819)
>> +++ trunk/stripes/src/net/sourceforge/stripes/exception/
>> DelegatingExceptionHandler.java      2008-01-31 05:28:16 UTC (rev 820)
>> @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@
>> import net.sourceforge.stripes.config.Configuration;
>> import net.sourceforge.stripes.util.Log;
>> import net.sourceforge.stripes.util.ResolverUtil;
>> -import net.sourceforge.stripes.util.StringUtil;
>> -import
>> net.sourceforge.stripes.controller.AnnotatedClassActionResolver;
>>
>> import javax.servlet.ServletException;
>> import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
>> @@ -29,6 +27,7 @@
>> import java.lang.reflect.Method;
>> import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
>> import java.util.HashMap;
>> +import java.util.HashSet;
>> import java.util.Map;
>> import java.util.Set;
>>
>> @@ -78,12 +77,6 @@
>>    /** Configuration key used to lookup the package filters used
>> when scanning for handlers. */
>>    @Deprecated public static final String PACKAGE_FILTERS =
>> "DelegatingExceptionHandler.PackageFilters";
>>
>> -    /**
>> -     * Configuration key used to lookup the list of packages to
>> scan for auto handlers.
>> -     * @since Stripes 1.5
>> -     */
>> -    public static final String PACKAGES =
>> "DelegatingExceptionHandler.Packages";
>> -
>>    private Configuration configuration;
>>
>>    /** Provides subclasses with access to the configuration object.
>> */
>> @@ -133,8 +126,10 @@
>>        // Fetch the AutoExceptionHandler implementations and add
>> them to the cache
>>        Set<Class<? extends AutoExceptionHandler>> handlers =
>> findClasses();
>>        for (Class<? extends AutoExceptionHandler> handler :
>> handlers) {
>> -            log.debug("Processing class ", handler, " looking for
>> exception handling methods.");
>> -            addHandler(handler);
>> +            if (!Modifier.isAbstract(handler.getModifiers())) {
>> +                log.debug("Processing class ", handler, " looking
>> for exception handling methods.");
>> +                addHandler(handler);
>> +            }
>>        }
>>    }
>>
>> @@ -245,31 +240,10 @@
>>                      "you should specify neither ", URL_FILTERS, "
>> or ", PACKAGE_FILTERS,
>>                      ". Instead you should specify a comma
>> separated list of package roots ",
>>                      "(e.g. com.myco.web) that should be scanned
>> for implementations of ",
>> -                      "AutoExceptionHandler, using the
>> configuration parameter '", PACKAGES,  "'.");
>> +                      "AutoExceptionHandler, using the
>> configuration parameter '",
>> +                      BootstrapPropertyResolver.EXTENSION_LIST,
>> "'.");
>>        }
>> -
>> -        String packages = bootstrap.getProperty(PACKAGES);
>> -        if (packages == null) {
>> -            log.info("No configuration value was found for
>> parameter '", PACKAGES,
>> -                     "' defaulting to using the value of '",
>> AnnotatedClassActionResolver.PACKAGES,
>> -                     "' instead.");
>> -            packages =
>> bootstrap.getProperty(AnnotatedClassActionResolver.PACKAGES);
>> -        }
>> -
>> -        if (packages == null) {
>> -            throw new StripesRuntimeException(
>> -                    "You must supply a value for the configuration
>> parameter '" + PACKAGES + "', " +
>> -                    "or /at least/ a value for '" +
>> AnnotatedClassActionResolver.PACKAGES +
>> -                    "' when using the DelegatingExceptionHandler.
>> The  value should be a list of " +
>> -                    "one or more package roots (comma separated)
>> that are to be scanned for " +
>> -                    "AutoExceptionHandler implementations. The
>> packages specified and all " +
>> -                    "subpackages are examined for implementations
>> of AutoExceptionHandler."
>> -            );
>> -        }
>> -
>> -        String[] pkgs = StringUtil.standardSplit(packages);
>> -        ResolverUtil<AutoExceptionHandler> resolver = new
>> ResolverUtil<AutoExceptionHandler>();
>> -        resolver.findImplementations(AutoExceptionHandler.class,
>> pkgs);
>> -        return resolver.getClasses();
>> +        return new HashSet<Class<? extends AutoExceptionHandler>>(
>> +
>> bootstrap.getClassPropertyList(AutoExceptionHandler.class));
>>    }
>> }
>>
>>
>> This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development
>> platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stripes-development mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Stripes-development mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development

/Jeppe




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Stripes-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development

Reply via email to