Revision: 890
          http://stripes.svn.sourceforge.net/stripes/?rev=890&view=rev
Author:   bengunter
Date:     2008-04-18 21:53:37 -0700 (Fri, 18 Apr 2008)

Log Message:
-----------
Fixed STS-533. Added a note about how _sourcePage is encrypted and you can 
access the plaintext value through ActionBeanContext. Also corrected the 
addSourcePage attribute name.

Modified Paths:
--------------
    trunk/upgrading.txt

Modified: trunk/upgrading.txt
===================================================================
--- trunk/upgrading.txt 2008-04-19 04:51:24 UTC (rev 889)
+++ trunk/upgrading.txt 2008-04-19 04:53:37 UTC (rev 890)
@@ -87,7 +87,11 @@
        -> The _sourcePage parameter is no longer inserted into links (using 
the link and
           url tags) by default (it is still submitted in forms). If the 
_sourcePage parameter
           is relied on in certain places you can request Stripes insert it 
using the new
-          attribute sourcePage="true".
+          attribute addSourcePage="true".
+
+       -> The _sourcePage parameter is always encrypted to avoid revealing 
potentially
+          sensitive information. The plaintext value can be easily accessed by 
calling
+          the new method ActionBeanContext.getSourcePage().
        
        -> The way Interceptor classes are configured has changed. Two 
configuration 
           properties are supported: 'Interceptor.Classes' and 
'CoreInterceptor.Classes'.


This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the 
world's largest Open Source development site.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Stripes-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development

Reply via email to