The master branch is where development for the next major release takes
place, currently 1.6. The 1.5.x branch is where maintenance work for 1.5.x
takes place. The branches were copied from the Subversion repository
automatically. Personally, I'd prefer not to start messing around with the
branches at this point.


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:45 AM, VANKEISBELCK Remi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to create a hot fix and discovered that we have 2 separate
> branches with different commits with the same comments. This is weird, why ?
>
> What is the "master" branch for 1.5.x  ?
>
> To all commiters in the github repo : would you be ok to adopt a git-flow
> branch style ?
> I've been using it for years and it's a good model, plus you have the
> associated tooling (git flow ...).
> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
> https://github.com/nvie/gitflow
>
> Cheers
>
> Rémi
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get
> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Stripes-development mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Stripes-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-development

Reply via email to