On 19-05-2008 at 15:32, Ben Gunter wrote: > The JIRA issue I created this morning > (http://www.stripesframework.org/jira/browse/STS-568) proposes that if > _eventName is present then it should override any other parameters. In a > comment, Tim pointed out a reason why we might not want to do that. It's > one of those things that could happen but probably not very often. We're > wondering what you all think about it, and how many of you thought > _eventName would override other parameters.
My preference is that the presence of this field will override the normal event resolution. The other option would be that it specifies a default in case the event cannot be inferred from the presence of fields that are named after one of the events. But according to me, we already have @DefaultHandler for that. Regardless of the outcome however, I think it would be a good idea to document it. I just did a search on the website, and it isn't there. Kind of disappointing, as we're spoiled with how much it _does_ explain. Oscar -- ,-_ I love deadlines. /() ) I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. (__ ( -- Douglas Adams =/ () ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Stripes-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
