It looks pretty good except it would be really nice to not have to use a special filter. An interceptor would be better with all the bells and whistles you have provided thus far.
Gregg Zenin, Ruslan wrote: > It looks really good! > > I like constructor DI better too! > > So you do extend your " com.google.inject.servlet.GuiceFilter" from > Stripes filter? That means no need to configure > net.sourceforge.stripes.controller.StripesFilter? > > What about Stripes security? Are you covering it too? By Stripes > security I mean class: " > net.sourceforge.stripes.security.controller.StripesSecurityFilter" and > associated annotations...(see: > http://stripesframework.org/display/stripes/Securing+Stripes+With+ACLs) > > Regards, > Ruslan > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam > Beran > Sent: June 4, 2008 11:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Stripes-users] Ann: Stripes-guicer (Guice for Stripes) > > > Hello all, > > I've started work on a project to allow Guice DI for stripes' > ActionBeans > and ActionBeanContext. It's at http://code.google.com/p/stripes-guicer/ > http://code.google.com/p/stripes-guicer/ . I think Stripes and Guice are > a > great fit. > > I know there's been a recipe for Guice posted on this mailing list > before, > but it didn't allow constructor injection, which I prefer. If you're > interested, please check it out, and let me know if you have any > suggestions, I'm all ears! > > Sam > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Stripes-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
