Hey Cosmin, You are right, this would be the name of the event, not the name of the event handler method. But, in the absence of the @HandlesEvent annotation, the default is that the name of the method == name of event. I only tend to use @HandlesEvent in the rare cases where the name of the method is not suitable as the name of the event.
Indeed, this should be on the main website. There was a discussion on the mailing list: http://www.nabble.com/Another-quick-poll-to17326251.html and a JIRA issue: http://www.stripesframework.org/jira/browse/STS-568 But, yeah, that's not a replacement for documenting it on the main Stripes website. Updating the docs for Stripes 1.5 is a "work in progress". Cheers, Freddy http://www.stripesbook.com - Hey Freddy, - - Thanks for the prompt response. This seems like a lot better idea. Too - bad it isn't documented on the stripesframework.org website (or at least - I couldn't find it anywhere). So I am guessing that this event name will - actually translate in the method name and not the name of the event to - handle? - I was expecting that the method marked with @HandlesEvent("execute") to - be the one correlated with <s:hidden name="_eventName" value="execute"/> - rather than the method called execute. - - Thanks again, - Cosmin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Stripes-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
