Me again on the Stripes Book. I'm re-reading it, trying to get a better
grasp on the framework.
Daoud,
At page 48 (email_01 exemple), you're using the getContacts method with a
return type of List<Contact>, but in the final version of the code
(email_36), that same method has a return type of Collection<Contact>. Why
did you change the return types? What is the difference?
About the signature of the event handlers:
Throughout the book all (or almost all?) of the signed methods are named
getSomething, which are called from the JSPs templates via a
${ActionBean.something} tag. Why/how does Stripes 'cut' the 'get' part of
the method's name. Should all signed methods be getters? I see that there is
some non-getter methods being called in the JSPs, but these are called
explicitly, using the beanclass attribute inside the JSP's tags.
Don't know, but somehow I think that by cutting the 'get' part of the
method's name turns the more harder to read than otherwise.
thanks for the attention!
Fabio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
